Are we afraid to tell the truth about sexual assault and race?
One of the strange aftermaths of the Duke debacle is the question of race and sexual attacks. Is there a greater chance white men will assault a black women than a black man will assault a white woman? According to numbers, the answer should be yes, simply because there are many more white men than black men in the U.S.
The Duke case was not the first time some screamed bloody murder over a bogus rape charge of white men against a black woman. The agitators claimed they wanted a discussion of race and rape. Well, it appears they are getting one, and it isn’t what they had in mind.
Is this possibly because the truth is the inverse of what they (and others) want it to be?
Robert Lindsay writes,
An incredible anecdote: In a 3-yr period in the US, there were 9,000 cases of group Black on White sexual assaults - about 10 per day. In that same 3-year period, Whites, with a 4.5 times greater population, committed exactly zero group sexual assaults on Blacks. That figure alone is simply stunning.
The Left loves to talk about hate crimes, but the only hate crimes they are interested in are White hate crimes against non-Whites. The report makes it quite clear that Blacks are much more likely to commit hate crimes against Whites than vice versa.
What is fascinating is that the media plays up White on Black hate crimes for weeks on end as the crime of the century, while Black on White hate crimes are met with deafening silence from the media. That right there would seem to give the lie to the notion that the US media is hopelessly prejudiced against Blacks and in favor of Whites. If anything, the opposite seems to be the case.
(See The Color of Crime from 1999)
I have also asked friends if these statistics are real. Most have said no, but no one has explained how they are flawed. Lawrence Auster claimed in Front Page Magazine that,
In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.
What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black man.
Why this is a Jewish issue
No one has been a bigger supporter of Hate Crimes than Jewish defense groups. And Hate Crimes seem to target white crimes against others, and are only reluctantly enforced against those who attack regular whites. The underlying fear seems to assume that white crimes against minorities is a significant problem. But the statistics seem to say something quite different.
Additionally, our ownership of media outlets is, well, disproportionate.
If there is a blackout on these types of crimes, we have a strong hand in enforcing it. Why is that?
And what exactly are we afraid of?
8 comments
We are clearly on the opposite side on Zionism, but we may put that aside for the moment.
Thx for the link.
It was probably as difficult for you to write this piece as it was for a Leftist like me to write mine.
You ask why this is so. I assume it is because the Jews who have influence in the media tend to fear a monolithic culture. In the US, that would be a White, Christian culture. Such cultures have committed some pretty horrendous crimes against Jews recently. Blacks have not committed any major genocidal acts against Jews, and neither have Hispanics. White Supremacists are an obvious threat to the Jews. Go to some of their sites, look around, and see how they praise Hitler. They also happen to hate Blacks and Hispanics. Black and Hispanic radicals are often anti-Semites, true, but they have done little or no damage to Jews. I guess looking at the 3 groups of ethnocentrists, the Jews in the media figure the neo-Nazi Whites are the scariest of all.
I also think there is a fear among media Jews that addressing Black on White hate crimes feeds the White Supremacist beast, thereby endangering Jews. They are walking a tightrope here.
Personally, I think it is time for the Jews in the media to address, at the very least, Hispanic and Black anti-Semitism. And Jews being White (I do not care what Nazis think - what else are they?), Jews are on the receiving end of any Black and Hispanic on White crime. When it comes to that, Jewish and Gentile Whites are in the same boat.
How is this blog connected with the main Jewschool site?
Nice writing, too, BTW.
Hi Robert Lindsay,
It should be noted that blackouts against the race or religion of the assailant appear to exist in other countries as well in Europe…countries that do not have Jews in large numbers, and countries where the few Jews are generally more than happy to point to the religion of the Muslim assailant.
But indeed, it does seem to be different here.
I personally think submerging the truth is usually a dubious prospect, especially when being done on behalf of others you have no reason to trust. Sometimes internally in the Jewish community I see those who offer reflexive answers for these problems, and these easy but insufficiently convincing answers are offered both too quickly and too loudly.
As for my relationship with Jewschool, well, I wrote there for a couple of years, but was kicked off at one point for not being Left enough and for fighting with the far-Left too vigorously. During that period, my personal blog was transferred onto the Jewschool network, so I had a larger place to rant on issues that did not really fit Jewschool’s P.O.V.
Anyway, I was eventually brought back to Jewschool proper (but had this blog to write on subjects like say, this one), but left again recently, with Dan’s exit, and my concern that I did not have enough common ground nor, quite frankly, time and energy to help the remaining writers build up the site once more. So I will have this blog transferred off the Jewschool network as well soon enough.
As you probably are aware, it’s not easy finding a comfortable place when being a self-hating Leftist.
And now…what is your story, Mr. Lindsay? How did you come to a place where you are willing to defy party lines? Isn’t being a Leftist (but not on race) a bitch? Are there more like you? Or are you moving rightward?
And how come you give a link to the Communist Party on your site?
Hey DK,
most rapes by white perpetrators are date rapes, and therefore are very often unreported. I don’t have statistics on how many of those are against white or black victims, but it would stand to reason that as there are more white women, there are more white victims.
I am trying to remember the name of the book where I read this statistic, but it said that black on white rape is the least common, but the most reported. I’ll see if I can find it.
“I am trying to remember the name of the book where I read this statistic, but it said that black on white rape is the least common, but the most reported.”
It doesn’t look like that is the case.
I am not sure that every sexual assault should be cast as a hate crime, especially as a race-based hate crime. when a white man sexually assaults a white woman, it is not a hate crime. i would imagine that it would have to be based on race. perhaps some of these instances are indeed race-based, but i would imagine that a good deal are not.
while the Duke case was indeed a travesty, what made some people consider it race-based was the accusation that one of them had made a racial slur, and other such factors such as disparity of background and social situation.
Josh,
I am less interested in if something were a hate crime than if a crime were committed. If a crime were committed, I am more interested if it were provoked or unprovoked than the exact nature of it being unprovoked. If a person was harmed because of their haircut instead of their race, that bothers me just as much. Perhaps I am just insensitive.
You mentioned concern over “other such factors such as disparity of background and social situation.”
Well, those weren’t factors really at Duke, since there was no rape. But you know where they might very well be issues? In prison. Black rape of white men is horrific, and has been a problem for decades.
http://www.hrw.org/reports/200.....port4.html
How did you come to a place where you are willing to defy party lines?
Well, I am mostly an economic Leftist. To me, that is all that is important. I don’t think that any existing Communist regime engaged in Cultural Marxism or worshiped the Frankfurt School. Stalin and Mao never even talked about race, nor did Ho. I believe in telling the truth. Plus I have life experience that backs up what I am saying. I have always been the sort of person that tells it like it is and pisses of everyone.
Isn’t being a Leftist (but not on race) a bitch?
I suppose, but I really do not care. Actually there is a site called Thephora where there are a lot of people like that. And you will find a lot of Russian Leftists who think like I do. And unfortunately, the Zionists are correct that there is a certain amount of anti-Semitism on the Left, even the Far Left. I know some Arab Communists who are just raving anti-Semites. And I am appalled by some of what I read from Russian Communists.
Are there more like you?
Specifically like me? You might be surprised in talking to some Russian Leftists though.
Or are you moving rightward?
I do not know. I doubt it. But if writing the stuff I do makes me a rightwinger on race, then maybe I am one. I am not sure.
And how come you give a link to the Communist Party on your site?
I am still a party member, though I have been thrown out of the local cell for “supporting capitalism” and “not being a revolutionary”. I think it is because I support social democracy. I also vote Democratic and am a member of the Green Party too. Go figure.
This guy has me sort of figured out. Better than anyone else anyway.
Leave a Comment