The ADL Has No Sack
The ADL is using the same tools to address vicious African-Muslim gang violence as they do to denounce prominent genteel WASP slips of the tongue.
The situation makes ADL’s Abe Foxman “sad.” He recognizes that Sarkozy (the most pro-Jewish French president since Léon Blum) is concerned and committed to “fight” anti-Semitism, and is obviously proud the ADL has been calling for just that, but seems oblivious that his policy of press releases and condemnations isn’t doing dick.
Instead, the ADL remains one of the most egregious supporters of continued mass immigration to any community, and is one of the worst revisionist promoters this side of Aish HaTorah.
It is the ADL who first published this nonsense that U.S. is “A Nation of Immigrants.” In fact, the U.S. was founded by SETTLERS. And just so you know, when Africans were brought over against their will chained to a boat, that also isn’t “immigration” either. Sorry, liberal Jew people.
Jewish groups reference the ADL book authored by Kennedy as if it were a neutral outside source. It is not. Jews have no right to deny American history like this. It’s funny as well, because it denies our own history in the U.S. We first landed here in 1654. But I guess Joe Ashkenazi does not care. He is too busy building Holocaust museums to read about stuff that far back.
The ADL republished this book in order to continue promoting this absurd myth. They will do nothing to stop this country from absorbing millions of Muslims from the most brutal corners of Africa and the Middle East.
The ADL is a major part of the problem for world and American Jewry. They ADL should condemn themselves, send out a press release about how they are disappointed in their own behavior, and demand that everyone prove their sensitivity to Jewish and American issues by denouncing them.
1 comment
“It is the ADL who first published this nonsense that U.S. is “A Nation of Immigrants.” In fact, the U.S. was founded by SETTLERS.”
No, they were immigrants. That the earliest ones had to actually cut down trees and build their own houses changes nothing. They immigrated from one place to another. I know, all of my ancestors including the American Indians were immigrants. The Indians merely moved here a bit earlier, but they still moved in from somewhere else.
Are you trying to connote some special connection with where they moved to by calling them settlers? There was none. The only point of moving somewhere for humans is that it isn’t where they came from. The entire species has had a 200,000 year case of Grass is Greener Somewhere Else. If Asia Minor’s longest term inhabitants had enough foresight, they might have invented the roadside motel to make coin from all the passers-through.
Denying those Muslims immigration because of the places they come from would be inane. Should those who fled minutes ahead of the Nazis been denied immigration to wherever they went because they came from the trailer park of Christianity? We do things that way and we’d have to put a wall around West Virginia to keep them from moving elsewhere.
Sure the demographics are frightening. The same was said about the now coming true and way back when predicted outcome of outsourcing goods and services. Invest money in the third world as a way of saving a buck over first world workers, and well… how are you going to keep them down on the farm now that they have enough money to build their own first world?
But denying them respite from their situation out of fear of them joining the global market and competition for resource consumption would have been bigoted and selfish.
The future is always scary. You just have to have more faith in the world and yourself than that. Contribute to the betterment of the inevitable change instead of fearing the being run over by it.
Leave a Comment