<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Likelihood of Success Defends Socialism and Socialists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kvetcher.net/2008/10/1689/likelihood-of-defense-defends-socialism-and-socialists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kvetcher.net/2008/10/1689/likelihood-of-defense-defends-socialism-and-socialists/</link>
	<description>kvetch \KVECH\, intransitive verb: To complain habitually. noun: 1. A complaint 2. A habitual complainer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:29:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://kvetcher.net/2008/10/1689/likelihood-of-defense-defends-socialism-and-socialists/comment-page-1/#comment-8077</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 07:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kvetcher.net/?p=1689#comment-8077</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don’t pretend to be an expert on economics, but I’m glad that there are books coming out now casting a new perspective on the hagiography of Roosevelt that passes for history.&lt;/i&gt;

Some policies were quite flawed. Others are universally acclaimed, such as FDIC. TVA, which promoted electric power access in the south was an important measure long-term, even if not one that immediately produced results. But the Neocon&#039;s general perspective of Roosevelt&#039;s policies is not holding up. Read &quot;FDR: The First Hundred Days&quot;for an overview of some of these critical programs, which contains discussion of Neocon criticism of Roosevelt.

&lt;i&gt;A pretty good argument could be made that Roosevelt was one of our worst presidents.&lt;/i&gt;

Oh, really? Let&#039;s hear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I don’t pretend to be an expert on economics, but I’m glad that there are books coming out now casting a new perspective on the hagiography of Roosevelt that passes for history.</i></p>
<p>Some policies were quite flawed. Others are universally acclaimed, such as FDIC. TVA, which promoted electric power access in the south was an important measure long-term, even if not one that immediately produced results. But the Neocon&#8217;s general perspective of Roosevelt&#8217;s policies is not holding up. Read &#8220;FDR: The First Hundred Days&#8221;for an overview of some of these critical programs, which contains discussion of Neocon criticism of Roosevelt.</p>
<p><i>A pretty good argument could be made that Roosevelt was one of our worst presidents.</i></p>
<p>Oh, really? Let&#8217;s hear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ichabod Chrain</title>
		<link>http://kvetcher.net/2008/10/1689/likelihood-of-defense-defends-socialism-and-socialists/comment-page-1/#comment-8076</link>
		<dc:creator>Ichabod Chrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kvetcher.net/?p=1689#comment-8076</guid>
		<description>Roosevelt  looking good?  Revisionist slander?  How so? 
I don&#039;t pretend to be an expert on economics, but I&#039;m glad that there are books coming out now casting a new perspective on the hagiography of Roosevelt that passes for history.  A pretty good argument could be made that Roosevelt was one of our worst presidents.
As for Obama, whether he&#039;s actually called for nationalization of industry as a campaign issue isn&#039;t the point.  Look at how he&#039;s voted , the role he sees government playing, and who his associates are .  As the Good Books says, &quot;By their deeds ye&#039; shall know them.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roosevelt  looking good?  Revisionist slander?  How so?<br />
I don&#8217;t pretend to be an expert on economics, but I&#8217;m glad that there are books coming out now casting a new perspective on the hagiography of Roosevelt that passes for history.  A pretty good argument could be made that Roosevelt was one of our worst presidents.<br />
As for Obama, whether he&#8217;s actually called for nationalization of industry as a campaign issue isn&#8217;t the point.  Look at how he&#8217;s voted , the role he sees government playing, and who his associates are .  As the Good Books says, &#8220;By their deeds ye&#8217; shall know them.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
