Immigration critical for terrorists
November 16, 2009 Immigration
“The whole purpose is immigration”
What are you going to do now? Accuse the terrorists themselves of generalizing that “every Muslim” is a terrorist?
The Forward reports,
A U.S. citizen of Pakistan origin allegedly posed as a Jew in order to enter the Mumbai Chabad center and prepare for last year’s attack.
David Coleman Headley, 49, was arrested last month in Chicago as he tried to make his way to Pakistan via Philadelphia.
That’s bad, but India Times tells us it’s not just an “isolated incident” of a “crazy person.”
Suspected Lashkar operative Tahawwur Hussain Rana’s plan to form a terror team wasn’t just confined to India. He was looking to slip terrorists into the US as well under the garb of employment visas, according to an FBI affidavit against him and his accomplice David Coleman Headley.
And there’s still more.
“Only one loophole is business, which they believe is OK…Make him a cook. Tell him that he has a diploma for a two-year or four-year, it can even be from some food stand – but it must confirm that ‘yes, I’m a cook’. And he should learn something. The whole purpose is immigration, right,” Rana said.
8 comments
@ DK;
Having read your post on Jewcy, it’s clear your concern is not the nexus between terrorism and immigration at all. You also did not mention any of the usual canards regarding immigration; costs, crime, or ‘the law.’ Essentially, you are upset about whites decreasing percentage of the US population, a trend ostensibly exacerbated by immigration.
That being the case, why would it be inaccurate to describe your immigration stance as ‘white nationalist’?
Given that below replacement white birth rates are a global phenomenon, why do you blame ‘Hispanics’ for the dwindling white populations of the world?
Why do you insist on comparing a nation of immigrants, such as the USA, with nation-states?
I don’t know how old you are, but the rising tide of color in America and worldwide, will surely be causing much consternation for you in coming decades.
Perhaps you can take comfort in the fact that Latin American nations, including Mexico, are following the same demographic trajectory of European nations? (we’re just 2 generations behind).
Assuming US census projections are ballpark, virtually all nations of the world will have below below replacement white birth rates by 2050.
Bottom line; given your concerns, I assume you will be sending NumbersUSA, FAIR, VDARE, etc large year end checks so they can expand their operations?
Temoc, do you support mass Muslim immigration? If so, why? How is that in American interests? Please explain.
How do you define ‘mass immigration’?
Between 1880-1924, about 1 million immigrants were arriving annually on Americas shores. This amounted to 1% of the US population of about 100 million at the time. Does this qualify as ‘mass immigration’?
If we define ‘mass immigration’ as 1% of the population, the US is nowhere near that level today. The 1 million immigrants arriving annually nowadays amounts to 0.0033% of the current population.
Seems to me that advocates of ‘mass immigration’ are generally dismissed as crackpots by average Joe/Janes. It doesn’t matter what the ethnic/religious/racial/etc flavor of the ‘mass immigration’ is. I would tend to agree that advocates of ‘mass immigration’ are usually kooks.
I also recognize the security implications of illegal immigration in a post 9-11 world – thats why I fervently support ‘comprehensive immigration reform’. Though Mexican nationals are ‘only’ 60% of the estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants, I do think the US should get a quid pro quo; Mexico should agree to patrol its side of the border. We could even have joint US-Mexico border patrols.
That said; I don’t see the problem with Muslim immigration per se. Of the MILLIONS of US Muslims, how many are actually wack jobs like Nidal Hasan? Does the statue of liberty have a clause that exenpts people based on their religion?
“Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”
Why would you demonize MILLIONS of people based on the actions of a small minority?
The answer lies in your post concerning immigration on Jewcy; your concern is the declining white percentage of the US population.
For example; El Paso, TX sits just across the river from the most violent city in Mexico – Juarez. El Paso is 3/4 ‘Hispanic’ and more than 1/4 are foreign born. Yet, there were ‘just’ 18 murders in El Paso last year, in a city of 736,000 people. To compare, Baltimore, with 637,000 residents, had 234 killings.
El Paso, TX is among the safest cities in America yet demagogues will rail against the ‘handful’ of murders committed by undocumented immigrants (most of which probably involve undocumented immigrant victims). They do so not because they care about the grieving families involved, but because this allows them to demonize ‘Hispanics’ at large, using crime as cover.
In other words; they cannot see the forest because their hatred of non-whites has them obsessed with some trees.
This is the tactic I see in your increasing demonization of Somalis.
Thus, given that your true concern is the dwindling percentage of whites in the US, wouldn’t your efforts be better spent attempting to revive below replacement white birth rates?
Finally, since your concerns can be characterized as ‘white nationalist’, I wonder which side of the march depicted in this youtube video you would be on. Will you be donating to JD Hayworths’ Arizona Senate campaign? I assume you are a regular contributor to Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce?
Temoc,
So you see no threat at all by Muslim immigration, none at all, correct?
And you have stooped to calling me a Nazi on my own blog, also correct?
And I should put up with that because…?
Has it occurred to you that you are boring as well as obnoxious? Read up on Godwin’s Law, and come back when you are interested in having an intelligent conversation, and not behaving like some infuriated Leftist Jew–an example that you clearly seek to emulate.
‘So you see no threat at all by Muslim immigration, none at all, correct? ‘
Though we still have not defined ‘mass immigration’. The answer is YES; I see no threat from Muslim immigration per se.
‘And you have stooped to calling me a Nazi on my own blog, also correct?’
Is ‘white nationalist’ synonymous with Nazi? I am not sure.
Your post concerning immigration on Jewcy makes clear your concern is the declining percentage of whites in the US – everything else is peripheral. Thus; why is it inaccurate to characterize your immigration stance as ‘white nationalist’?
I’ll add;
There are Muslims, Jews, Catholics, Hindus and even Buddhists right here on my block. What difference would it make to me what religion some nutbar(s) chose to distort in order to justify atrocities against innocent people?
Heck, as a ‘Hispanic’ person, it seems that people calling themselves CATHOLICS are the ones that hate me the most; Pat Buchanan, Kevin McDonald, Steve Sailer, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, to name a few.
Perhaps a better question is; of the MILLIONS of US Muslims, how many are religious extremists ready to lash out at society at large?
We both know the number is very low – which brings me back to your post on Jewcy concerning immigration as it reveals your true fears regarding immigration – the declining percentage of whites in the US.
Bottom line IMHO; demonizing US Muslims to the point where they feel marginalized is not a prudent path because US Muslims are our first line of defense against the handful of nutbar(s) in their community who would carry out some dastardly act.
P.S. 1 million immigrants arriving in the US annually equals 0.33% of the US population, not 0.0033% as I incorrectly stated in my previous post.
I’m sure you would be just as ecumenical if the Spanish started *immigrating* en masse to Mexico.
I am so sure you would be the first in line to welcome them and admonish everyone else to welcome them as well.
Or if the British started coming over to Mexico.
There are Muslims, Jews, Catholics, Hindus and even Buddhists right here on my block. What difference would it make to me what religion some nutbar(s) chose to distort in order to justify atrocities against innocent people?
That would be when it is disproportionate to their numbers and when it is based on theology.
That would be when it would make a difference.
“I’m sure you would be just as ecumenical if the Spanish started *immigrating* en masse to Mexico.”
Are you completely ignorant of world history? The Spanish *did* immigrate en masse to Mexico. Though there were some insane nativist xenophobic racists who opposed them, we can now see in retrospect that the Spanish were just coming in search of a better life.
It’s the height of irony that you would be writing this from the USA, which has been more enriched by immigration than any country on Earth. People like you and Lou Dobbs are like the Apaches and Sioux who were fearful and hostile to the hard-working European immigrants just because of the color of their skin. Their bigotry was proven wrong, as those European immigrants proved to be a huge boon to the economy.
What’s most amazing is that you could harbor these thoughts so close to Thanksgiving, a holiday that celebrates the assimilation of European immigrants to their host culture and the prosperity brought about by diversity on this continent. It was a long and difficult struggle for European immigrants to overcome the bigotry and intolerance of the American Indians, but today we live side by side as equals – we have even had a European President!
I can only hope that we learn from the lessons of the American Indians, and change our way of thinking before racial strife tears this country apart again.
Leave a Comment